<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Relativity of Outages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnmwillis.com/amazon/the-relativity-of-outages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnmwillis.com/amazon/the-relativity-of-outages/</link>
	<description>JOHNMWILLIS BLOG</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 23:53:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: February 2008 - Review Post &#124; IT Management and Cloud Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.johnmwillis.com/amazon/the-relativity-of-outages/comment-page-1/#comment-10091</link>
		<dc:creator>February 2008 - Review Post &#124; IT Management and Cloud Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnmwillis.com/cloud-computing/the-relativity-of-outages/#comment-10091</guid>
		<description>[...] The Relativity of Outages [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Relativity of Outages [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johnmwillis.com/amazon/the-relativity-of-outages/comment-page-1/#comment-2293</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnmwillis.com/cloud-computing/the-relativity-of-outages/#comment-2293</guid>
		<description>I asked this question on the Tivoli message board this morning and didn&#039;t get a strong response.  I was hoping to hear more of the &quot;Brick-n-Mortar&quot; type responses. A total three outage at one of the investment banking divisions of BofA or JPChase would minimally get someone fired if not killed.  

You are spot on about the clouds.  It allows new companies to get the higher availability at a much lower cost. 

Thanks
John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I asked this question on the Tivoli message board this morning and didn&#8217;t get a strong response.  I was hoping to hear more of the &#8220;Brick-n-Mortar&#8221; type responses. A total three outage at one of the investment banking divisions of BofA or JPChase would minimally get someone fired if not killed.  </p>
<p>You are spot on about the clouds.  It allows new companies to get the higher availability at a much lower cost. </p>
<p>Thanks<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berkay</title>
		<link>http://www.johnmwillis.com/amazon/the-relativity-of-outages/comment-page-1/#comment-2292</link>
		<dc:creator>Berkay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnmwillis.com/cloud-computing/the-relativity-of-outages/#comment-2292</guid>
		<description>Hi John, 
Contrarian view :) couple of hours of downtime is acceptable for many many applications. It depends on when it happens, it depends on what the application is. it depends on the cost of the downtime. 
Planes need more than 5 nines, because when a plane crashes, people die. If I couldn&#039;t read your blog.. well it would hurt but I&#039;d survive :)
Just to note, your site was down when I first visited :) I think you were rebuilding your blog at the time. I came back later when I saw another post or link from someone else. 
For many companies, five nines is a dream. Not because they would not want to have it, but because the cost of the investment in hw/sw and expertise cannot be justified. It is expensive to get a lot of nines. 
There lies the attraction to clouds. If they can prove that they can provide that kind of reliability with low costs, it becomes quite an attractive option for many businesses IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,<br />
Contrarian view <img src='http://www.johnmwillis.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  couple of hours of downtime is acceptable for many many applications. It depends on when it happens, it depends on what the application is. it depends on the cost of the downtime.<br />
Planes need more than 5 nines, because when a plane crashes, people die. If I couldn&#8217;t read your blog.. well it would hurt but I&#8217;d survive <img src='http://www.johnmwillis.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Just to note, your site was down when I first visited <img src='http://www.johnmwillis.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I think you were rebuilding your blog at the time. I came back later when I saw another post or link from someone else.<br />
For many companies, five nines is a dream. Not because they would not want to have it, but because the cost of the investment in hw/sw and expertise cannot be justified. It is expensive to get a lot of nines.<br />
There lies the attraction to clouds. If they can prove that they can provide that kind of reliability with low costs, it becomes quite an attractive option for many businesses IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johnmwillis.com/amazon/the-relativity-of-outages/comment-page-1/#comment-2290</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnmwillis.com/cloud-computing/the-relativity-of-outages/#comment-2290</guid>
		<description>I totally agree.  As more things become commodities the more import it will be to stand out in a crowd, and &quot;anything&quot; unavailable will not be tolerated. 

Thanks
John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree.  As more things become commodities the more import it will be to stand out in a crowd, and &#8220;anything&#8221; unavailable will not be tolerated. </p>
<p>Thanks<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Kleinburg</title>
		<link>http://www.johnmwillis.com/amazon/the-relativity-of-outages/comment-page-1/#comment-2289</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Kleinburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnmwillis.com/cloud-computing/the-relativity-of-outages/#comment-2289</guid>
		<description>Thereâ€™s an additional point you may want to consider â€“ one of confidence.. Using your example, if I was a new visitor to your site, and when going to it for the first time, I got a server unavailable error, some of my first thoughts would be â€œThis guy doesnâ€™t know what heâ€™s doingâ€, and I might never come back.. 

Yes thereâ€™s the potential for lost revenue from a returning customer not being able to place an order, but the loss of future business as well to consider.. A three hour outage is a big deal.. It shows a basic lack of planning and testing.. flk k</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thereâ€™s an additional point you may want to consider â€“ one of confidence.. Using your example, if I was a new visitor to your site, and when going to it for the first time, I got a server unavailable error, some of my first thoughts would be â€œThis guy doesnâ€™t know what heâ€™s doingâ€, and I might never come back.. </p>
<p>Yes thereâ€™s the potential for lost revenue from a returning customer not being able to place an order, but the loss of future business as well to consider.. A three hour outage is a big deal.. It shows a basic lack of planning and testing.. flk k</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

