<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clouds so Swift</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnmwillis.com/cloud-computing/clouds-so-swift/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnmwillis.com/cloud-computing/clouds-so-swift/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=clouds-so-swift</link>
	<description>JOHNMWILLIS BLOG</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 03:04:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johnmwillis.com/cloud-computing/clouds-so-swift/comment-page-1/#comment-3180</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 00:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnmwillis.com/cloud-computing/clouds-so-swift/#comment-3180</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That is exactly my point.  Here is my definition of a &quot;holy grail&quot; cloud as per my recent cloud presentation in Atlanta. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Abstraction of the hardware from the service&lt;br /&gt;
2) Abstraction of the software from the service&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;See ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://www.johnmwillis.com/rightscale/cloud-talk/&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In other words a basic cloud should completely remove the dependence of a server.  Therefore you should be able to take a system image (theoretically) and drop it in any other cloud.  However, with the holy grail implementation you sould be able to take the service (i.e., server images don&#039;t matter they are just a templates) and drop it in any other cloud.  3Tera is the farthest along in this type of implementation. Rightscale has the &quot;Right&quot; idea but they are a strictly EC based implementation. When/if  they break out of that 3tera and Rightscale will be both in a standalone class. &lt;/p&gt;

Thanks
John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is exactly my point.  Here is my definition of a &#8220;holy grail&#8221; cloud as per my recent cloud presentation in Atlanta. </p>
<p>1) Abstraction of the hardware from the service<br />
2) Abstraction of the software from the service</p>
<p>See &#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.johnmwillis.com/rightscale/cloud-talk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.johnmwillis.com/rightscale/cloud-talk/</a></p>
<p>In other words a basic cloud should completely remove the dependence of a server.  Therefore you should be able to take a system image (theoretically) and drop it in any other cloud.  However, with the holy grail implementation you sould be able to take the service (i.e., server images don&#8217;t matter they are just a templates) and drop it in any other cloud.  3Tera is the farthest along in this type of implementation. Rightscale has the &#8220;Right&#8221; idea but they are a strictly EC based implementation. When/if  they break out of that 3tera and Rightscale will be both in a standalone class. </p>
<p>Thanks<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Cathcart</title>
		<link>http://www.johnmwillis.com/cloud-computing/clouds-so-swift/comment-page-1/#comment-3179</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Cathcart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 00:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnmwillis.com/cloud-computing/clouds-so-swift/#comment-3179</guid>
		<description>Actually John, I think you missed my key point which is much more radical, who cares about operating systems AT ALL. Necessary, but really not interesting. I don&#039;t understand the religious ferver behind them anymore.
See this blog entry from February
http://cathcam.wordpress.com/2008/02/06/finally-on-the-same-page/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually John, I think you missed my key point which is much more radical, who cares about operating systems AT ALL. Necessary, but really not interesting. I don&#8217;t understand the religious ferver behind them anymore.<br />
See this blog entry from February<br />
<a href="http://cathcam.wordpress.com/2008/02/06/finally-on-the-same-page/" rel="nofollow">http://cathcam.wordpress.com/2008/02/06/finally-on-the-same-page/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
