<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The IBM Amazon Missing Link</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnmwillis.com/ibm/the-ibm-amazon-missing-link/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnmwillis.com/ibm/the-ibm-amazon-missing-link/</link>
	<description>JOHNMWILLIS BLOG</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 23:53:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johnmwillis.com/ibm/the-ibm-amazon-missing-link/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnmwillis.com/wp/cloud-computing/the-ibm-amazon-missing-link/#comment-274</guid>
		<description>Jay,

&quot;they can be â€œthe man behind the man whoâ€™s supporting the manâ€.&quot; 

I like that. IBM is such a dichotomy.  They are a company that has virtually defined operating systems, relational database technology, and even put binary switches on electrons.  Then they turn around and produce OS/2 and almost kill DB2.  IMHO, the only time they partner well is when they plan on buying a company. The Goolge gig will could turn into another Microsoft.  I think IBM is back to the pre-Lou era where they make 5-10 year decisions and they are not reacting to the current sign posts. Heck what do I know?  You are right it will be really fun to watch next year and either way I think the consumer will benefit.

Thanks for commenting on my blog. 

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay,</p>
<p>&#8220;they can be â€œthe man behind the man whoâ€™s supporting the manâ€.&#8221; </p>
<p>I like that. IBM is such a dichotomy.  They are a company that has virtually defined operating systems, relational database technology, and even put binary switches on electrons.  Then they turn around and produce OS/2 and almost kill DB2.  IMHO, the only time they partner well is when they plan on buying a company. The Goolge gig will could turn into another Microsoft.  I think IBM is back to the pre-Lou era where they make 5-10 year decisions and they are not reacting to the current sign posts. Heck what do I know?  You are right it will be really fun to watch next year and either way I think the consumer will benefit.</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting on my blog. </p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.johnmwillis.com/ibm/the-ibm-amazon-missing-link/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnmwillis.com/wp/cloud-computing/the-ibm-amazon-missing-link/#comment-271</guid>
		<description>John,
As I mentioned in my comment to James&#039; post I have to believe that there&#039;s some missing link, though I think it has to include Yahoo &amp; Google in there somehow too.

However, I disagree with you that IBM will attempt another OS2. You suggest &quot;IBM will probably try to do everything themselves and go directly to the customers.&quot; however, IBM&#039;s not traditionally good with the class of customers that Amazon&#039;s catering too, i.e. really_small and small business.

IBM&#039;s philosophy will probably be the belief that they can be &quot;the man behind the man who&#039;s supporting the man&quot;. In other words, Amazon can support the end customer and IBM will attempt to position themselves as the enabler with Amazon.

As you mentioned there&#039;s some overlap between Amazon and Google, and don&#039;t forget that IBM and Google are &quot;partners&quot; in the Cloud Computing initiative, see; http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_52/b4064048925836.htm?campaign_id=rss_tech

Of course it&#039;s really written as Google&#039;s show with IBM as, the man behind the man...

But you&#039;re right to point out that &quot;Blue Cloud&quot; is different then the Business Week article... 

Looks like there&#039;s a lot of storm fronts afloat with all these clouds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,<br />
As I mentioned in my comment to James&#8217; post I have to believe that there&#8217;s some missing link, though I think it has to include Yahoo &amp; Google in there somehow too.</p>
<p>However, I disagree with you that IBM will attempt another OS2. You suggest &#8220;IBM will probably try to do everything themselves and go directly to the customers.&#8221; however, IBM&#8217;s not traditionally good with the class of customers that Amazon&#8217;s catering too, i.e. really_small and small business.</p>
<p>IBM&#8217;s philosophy will probably be the belief that they can be &#8220;the man behind the man who&#8217;s supporting the man&#8221;. In other words, Amazon can support the end customer and IBM will attempt to position themselves as the enabler with Amazon.</p>
<p>As you mentioned there&#8217;s some overlap between Amazon and Google, and don&#8217;t forget that IBM and Google are &#8220;partners&#8221; in the Cloud Computing initiative, see; <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_52/b4064048925836.htm?campaign_id=rss_tech" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_52/b4064048925836.htm?campaign_id=rss_tech</a></p>
<p>Of course it&#8217;s really written as Google&#8217;s show with IBM as, the man behind the man&#8230;</p>
<p>But you&#8217;re right to point out that &#8220;Blue Cloud&#8221; is different then the Business Week article&#8230; </p>
<p>Looks like there&#8217;s a lot of storm fronts afloat with all these clouds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

